#1: Chick Flicks are Worse Than Porn! Autor: ilija,
Postano: 02.08.2007. 5:59
Are you male? Do you watch porn? If your answers to these questions are ‘yes’ and ‘fuck yes’ respectively, you are more likely to objectify women. I am not assuming you do, but the likelihood is strong. The likelihood is correlated with how frequently you watch porn and how frequently an orgasm follows each viewing.
Porn usually consists of nude people (actors/actresses) engaging in a sexual act. What you don’t see is the girls’ and/or guys’ personalities, needs, wants, and desires. With enough exposure and orgasm reinforcements, you may confuse porn with reality. This is unfair to the woman or men who don’t want to be objectified. This may be the cause of dissonance between today’s intimate relationships.
Are porn viewers the only ones who are to blame for such a dissonance? I say that chick flicks are far worse than porn in this sense. Those sappy romance flicks give females a delusional notion of what romance is in reality. Some females who have been romantically desensitized by Disney films growing up won’t settle for anybody less than prince charming. Those same females grow up to watch other flicks like “The Notebook,” and “Titanic.” They enter the dating world thinking a man will sweep them off their feet without realizing their fat ass isn’t going anywhere.
It would be outrageous to limit romance to only a mature audience, but completely acceptable to do so for porn. Romance flicks have fewer stigmas than porn, but in reality, it is no less dangerous.
If you ever have your girlfriend drag you into chick flicks saying, “Hey, maybe you can learn a thing or two!” You equally have the right to invite her to see “Dildo Desires 7,” and say, “Hey, maybe you can learn a thing or two!”
P.S. Tell her to bring a notepad
Link: chick-flicks-are-worse-than-porn
|